By Michael Bitzer
With the holidays looming, Cheri Beasley's campaign for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate got an early Christmas gift, coming in the form of fellow competitor Jeff Jackson's suspension of his campaign and endorsement yesterday.
And with the primary election now two months later, thanks to the state gerrymandering lawsuit, Beasley's campaign gets to firm up her general campaign operations, including building a warchest for what will likely be one of the most expensive U.S. Senate races again in the nation. Republicans, however, will have to wait until May before what appears to be a bitter and brutal primary fight will be resolved.
And while most of the focus will be on the candidates and their strategies towards May and ultimately November, there's one other important group of individuals to consider: the voters. As my colleagues and I have been looking at the rise of North Carolina's unaffiliated registered voter, we have the data collected to see who has shown up in past primaries, especially by voter party registration or, in the case of the unaffiliated voter, lack thereof.
For the 2008 to 2020 primary elections, I collected each of the presidential and mid-term voter history data, which provides both the voter's party registration and the party primary selected. As a reminder, only partisan registered voters are allowed to participate in their primary, but unaffiliated registered voters can select either the Democratic or Republican primary ballot.
Here are the raw numbers of North Carolina registered voters and the party primaries selected. The darker shades indicate the partisan registered voters (dark blue for registered Democrats, red for registered Republicans), while the lighter shades indicated unaffiliated voters selecting either the Democratic primary (light blue) or the Republican primary (light red).
One noticeable trend that should not be a surprise, thanks to the overall rise of unaffiliated voters: the percentage in both party's primaries of unaffiliated voters has risen, from 10 to 15 percent in 2008 to over a quarter, and nearly 30 percent, in 2020's primary electorates. Both parties can allow, by state law, unaffiliated voters to participate in one primary.
With the exceptions of 2008 and 2020 (both significant Democratic primary contests), Republican party primaries have a higher percentage of unaffiliated voters in that primary than in Democratic primaries. Among those unaffiliated registered voters, the following chart gives the party primary breakdowns:
Between 2010 and 2016, significant majorities of unaffiliated voters who cast primary ballots chose the Republican contests. This shouldn't be a surprise, necessarily, because those same elections tended to have competitive GOP primaries (2010's Republican wave year dynamics; 2012 and 2016 saw open-seat Republican presidential primary contests, and 2014 was the U.S. Senate contest to take on Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator Kay Hagan).
With the 2022 path cleared for the Democrats (from what we can tell right now, six months out from the primary) for the U.S. Senate primary contest, the unaffiliated voter choice for primaries to vote in will likely be in the GOP primary, with its competitive U.S. Senate contest.
It will also be key to see what percentage of both party's 2022 primaries have unaffiliated voters in it, with the likely trajectory continuing to rise for unaffiliated voters in both parties' nomination contests (as clearly evident in this graph).
One looming question for both parties: with increasing numbers of unaffiliated voters participating, while there come a day that one party (or perhaps both) decides to revoke the invitation to unaffiliated voters to participate, and thereby go to a fully 'closed' primary system, that allows only registered party voters to participate in the selection of their nominees.
It's expected that registered unaffiliated voters may become the largest group of registered North Carolina voters by the time of 2022's primary election, using a conservative comparable percentage increase over 2021 to forecast 2022 numbers, as evident in this chart: